Application of this practical decision-making tool ranges from the tactical to the strategic for decision makers with different perspectives within or between agencies, in the field or at headquarters. It brings objectivity and rigour to the challenge of balancing humanitarian principles with practical choices in increasingly complex operating environments.

A series of questions examine the decision through four lenses – intent, impartiality, independence and impact. If they raise any doubts or serious concerns the decision is then subjected to further interrogation. The final step is implementation, comprising the final decision and action plan to address the issues identified through the process.

For further information please click on the circles above.

  • Intent INTENT Intent
  • Impartiality IMPARTIALITY Impartiality
  • Independence INDEPENDENCE Independence
  • Impact IMPACT Impact
  • Interrogation INTERROGATION Interrogation
  • Implementation IMPLEMENTATION Implementation
local context strategic alignment principles perceptions duty of care do no harm action sustainability